Three Travel Editors Speak Their Mind

I was the keynote speaker at the recent conference for the North American Travel Journalists Association, but of course I learned a thing or two while I was there. I had to miss the airline magazine editors’ panel while I was on a blogging one, but I did get to attend a panel with three other editors. They’re pictured here at the top:
Ken Shapiro, TravelAge West, Editor-in-Chief
David Lytle, Frommers.com, Editorial Director
Spud Hilton, San Francisco Chronicle, Travel Editor
These are three very different publications, with very different needs, but one thing they seemed to agree on: “We don’t owe you a living.” It was your choice to become a travel writer instead of say, a software manual technical writer, so don’t bitch and moan about how they’re not paying you enough to live on. Find a way to make it work, write your own rules for your own pub, or do something else. Spud Hilton was, as usual, the most outspoken and blunt. “Nowhere in my job description does it say I have to make it easier for you to vacation for a living.”
Beyond that tough love advice, here are some practical tips and thoughts that came out of the panel.
1) If you get a quick answer from one of them, it’s usually very bad or very good. Spud says he’ll answer right away if “This is the most brilliant thing I’ve ever seen” or “Have you considered another field?”
Ken added, “Don’t assume no news is bad news. The ‘no’ answers are the easiest and quickest.” The three agreed that six weeks was enough time that you could follow up by e-mail. Things do get lost or buried sometimes. Spud says he gets 400+ e-mails a day and most of those aren’t spam (unless you count press releases as spam). He added that there are only 12 full-time newspaper travel editors left in the United States, “but there are still 4,000 of you writers.”
2) Each publication has very different needs and if you don’t take the time to figure those out, you’re handicapped from the start. The San Francisco Chronicle only takes full stories on spec—and there had better be a real story in there. TravelAge West is a trade publication, so they want good writing but their audience is well-versed in the industry and doesn’t like a lot of b.s. or fluff. Frommer’s is all about cranking out lots of content, repurposing it, and filling custom requests for corporate clients. “We’re not looking for writers,” says David Lytle. “We’re looking for reporters, for data gatherers. Our ideal is someone who can also gather good photos, video, maybe even sound.” You often won’t get a byline with them and your material will show up elsewhere, syndicated, with just Frommer’s credited as the source. Decent paychecks, but no glory.
3) Your visibility matters a lot. Spud Hilton doesn’t care who you’ve written for before if the story is good. But he’s more likely to read and remember your e-mail if he’s met you before face-to-face and/or is following you online somehow. David at Frommer’s is more likely to hire an expert that he has found as an expert through Google searches. And if he’s met you before, even better. Ken at TravelAge West says he works with a lot of writers he first met in person.
4) Do it right the first time, then don’t slack off. If you do good work for one of these editors the first time, there’s a very good chance they’ll hire you again. It’s always a safer bet to go back to the well than to hire a newbie. Unfortunately, some writers take advantage of that ease of access and slack off after a while. “I’ve had some very experienced writers send me heaping piles of caca that should never be published anywhere,” says Spud.
“We’ve had to retire a few writers lately who were just not cutting it,” says David. “They were getting lazy and turning in substandard work.”
5) Have a clear angle in mind. You read this in every freelance writing book, but so many ignore it. If you don’t have a clear angle, you don’t have something to pitch. David says he’ll sometimes get the proverbial query of someone is going to Paris and asking if he needs anything from there. “I don’t know, a baguette?” he replies. The more specific and the more unique your idea, the better.
In general these publications pay between 20 and 40 cents per word, though David stresses that’s the old way of looking at compensation. They pay by project, which may or may not result in lots of words on a page of print. Plus guidebook writing for Frommer’s gets into a whole other financial framework.
I don’t want to incur the wrath of these three by publishing their e-mail addresses here for all to see, but you can find them in any reputable editor database (see our travel writing resources section) or by nosing around their websites. Here are their Twitter handles though and Spud says if you can fit your query into 140 characters, you’ve got a good angle.
@spudhilton
@davitydave
@kenshap

Tim,
Thanks for capturing the essence of that panel so succinctly. It’s much appreciated.
Best,
David
I love hearing Spud tell it like it is. It makes me weep a little, but I still love it. Thanks for encapsulating this event.
And hey, Tim, I’m ALSO a software technical manual writer, funnily enough, it’s how I pay my bills. If I didn’t love writing about travel enough to pursue it on the side, I’d make a lot more money.
Super-helpful synopsis. Ordered the kindle v of your book but at least I will donate the savings to charity.
Interesting read, but the comment about travel writers “vacationing for a living” stings and perpetuates a stereotype many of us are trying to fight against.
Also this trend in not wanting to pay writers a fair amount for work performed needs to end. Especially when editors are surprised when those same people stop giving 100%.
I don’t think anyone expects riches from this line of work, but some editors take advantage. If you are able to pay your bills, why would you begrudge me paying mine?
Good writing, decent pay, and respect are all possible in the travel world, no matter how many times these type of panels (and I’ve heard a few) insist otherwise.
CT – It’s simple economics: if someone else can do this fun job equally well for less money, they’ll get the work. You can say this isn’t “vacationing for a living” but it sure is a lot more fun than at least 95% of other jobs out there. Which is why there’s no shortage of people wanting to do it, despite the low pay. Unless you establish yourself as an expert who is worth more than the typical pen for hire, you’re not going to have any luck reversing this trend. It’s like politicians berating companies for moving manufacturing jobs to China when the economic forces at work have established a clear trend. If the quality is the same in the consumer’s eyes, the person paying the bills is always going to try to get it done for less.
“If you are able to pay your bills, why would you begrudge me paying mine?” In case you haven’t noticed, there are far fewer travel editors paying their bills than there used to be. As mentioned in the piece, only 12 full-time travel editors at newspapers now—in the entire USA! It’s not just freelancers.
How to get around this depressing trend? Well, I’ve got a book out you might want to read…
Tim, I bought your book a while ago, and do refer to it often. I believe in supporting those who encourage writers to continue in the business.
I’ve been at this game for many years and do realize the parameters have changed. Print did a number on me and admittedly, the online world turned me upside down. When an editor offers $50 for a 1000 word piece, I look around for the Candid Camera (I guess that dates me?). Am I really supposed to live off that? Perhaps you can in the China you mention, but I can’t move there just yet (but not ruling it out for the future).
I’m sure it’s easier to roll over and accept these new b.s. payments, but when we know there are outlets that continue to pay a decent rate (yes, they are out there), it makes me wonder why these panels don’t feature more of those editors instead of the ones who don’t offer much but bad news.The negative attitude from these folks is getting old.Maybe it’s because they aren’t making a living either?
I hear you CT and I’m not saying to roll over. I’m just saying it’s a new climate with different way to prosper. The whole idea of getting permission from others to get a steady check is becoming tougher in any industry. Seth Godin says we’ve entered a world of “joblets.”
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2011/09/the-forever-recession.html
Online editors aren’t trying to stick it to anyone when they only pay you $50 for 1,000 words. It’s usually the reality of their finances that this is what they can offer. I pay out a much higher percentage of income to freelancers on the sites I run than any magazine ever did, but the revenue is not as high to start with—and never will be. There’s infinite supply that keeps growing.
The online pubs paying well (and I should probably do a post on this someday) usually are not straight content sites. They’re part of a magazine’s empire, or they’re for trade readers, or their whole purpose is to support another more profitable enterprise—like a tour company or SEO agency.
fantastic discussion